Edited By Jonathan D. Kantrowitz
Published by Tsadek Press
Copyright Jonathan Kantrowitz 2014
Physical Activity and Performance at School
8.5 x 11, 110 pages
$10.95
2 Tsadek Press books $19.95
3 Tsadek Press books $24.95
2 Tsadek Press books $19.95
3 Tsadek Press books $24.95
Call 1-800-232--2224 to order a pdf of this title
Topics Covered:
· Educational Benefit of Exercise and Fitness
· Miscellaneous Physical Activity Research
- Healthy Eating and Drinking
· School Obesity Programs
· Physical Education Mandates
· Addressing Students’ Alcohol and Drug Use
- Addressing Smoking
o
Who Smokes
o
Smoking
Cessation Efforts
o
Hookah Smoking
o
Electronic
Cigarettes
· Addressing Mental Health Issues
· Sex
Education
· School Vaccinations
Sample reports:
Exercise helps
overweight children think better, do better in math
Regular
exercise improves the ability of overweight, previously inactive children to
think, plan and even do math, Georgia Health Sciences University researchers
report.
They
hope the findings in 171 overweight 7- to 11-year-olds – all sedentary when the
study started - gives educators the evidence they need to ensure that regular,
vigorous physical activity is a part of every school day, said Dr. Catherine
Davis, clinical health psychologist at GHSU's Georgia Prevention Institute and
corresponding author on the study in Health Psychology
"I
hope these findings will help reestablish physical activity's important place
in the schools in helping kids stay physically well and mentally sharp,"
Davis said. "For children to reach their potential, they need to be
active."
Aerobic fitness
boosts learning, memory in 9-10-year-old children
Physical
fitness can boost learning and memory in children, particularly when initial
learning on a task is more challenging, according to research published
September 11, 2013 in the open access journal PLOS ONE by Lauren Raine and colleagues from the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Forty-eight
children aged nine to ten were asked to memorize names and locations on a
fictitious map, either only by studying the information or being tested on the
material as they studied. Half the children were in the top 30% of their age
group on a test measuring aerobic fitness, while the other half scored in the
lowest 30 percent. When asked to recollect the information studied, children
who were fitter performed better than those who were not as fit.
The
difference between the high-fitness and low-fitness groups was also stronger
when the initial learning was performed by studying alone than when testing and
study were interspersed. Previous studies have suggested that combining testing
and study improves later recall in children, and is less challenging than
studying alone. Based on these results, the authors suggest that fitness levels
may influence learning differently when the study method used is more
challenging, and that higher levels of aerobic fitness can benefit learning and
memory in school-age children. They conclude, "Future research should
focus on the manner in which these factors impact the neural processes of
children during learning."
In
addition, the study suggests these findings may be important from an
educational policy perspective. As the authors state, "Reducing or
eliminating physical education in schools, as is often done in tight financial
times, may not be the best way to ensure educational success among our young
people."
To
measure cognition, researchers used the Cognitive Assessment System and
Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement III that measure abilities such as
planning and academic skills such as math and reading. A subset of the children
received functional magnetic resonance imaging highlighting increased or
decreased areas of brain activity.
MRIs
showed those who exercised experienced increased brain activity in the
prefrontal cortex – an area associated with complex thinking, decision making and
correct social behavior - and decreased activity in an area of the brain that
sits behind it. The shift forward appears consistent with more rapidly
developing cognitive skills, Davis said.
And
the more they exercised, the better the result. Intelligence scores increased
an average 3.8 points in those exercising 40 minutes per day after school for
three months with a smaller benefit in those exercising 20 minutes daily.
Activity
in the part of their brain responsible for so-called executive function also
increased in children who exercised. "In kids you just don't know what
impact you are going to have when you improve their ability to control their
attention, to behave better in school, to make better choices," Davis
notes. "Maybe they will be more likely to stay in school and out of
trouble."
Similar
improvements were seen in math skills; interestingly, no improvements were
found in reading skill. Researchers note that improved math achievement was
"remarkable" since no math lessons were given and suggests longer
intervention could produce even better results.
Children
in the exercise program played hard, with running games, hula hoops and jump
ropes, raising their heart rates to 79 percent of maximum, which is considered
vigorous.
Cognitive
improvements likely resulted from the brain stimulation that came from movement
rather than resulting cardiovascular improvements, such as increased blood and
oxygen supplies, Davis said. "You cannot move your body without your
brain."
The
researchers hypothesize that such vigorous physical activity promotes
development of brain systems that underlie cognition and behavior. Animal
studies have shown that aerobic activity increases growth factors so the brain
gets more blood vessels, more neurons and more connections between neurons.
Studies in older adults have shown exercise benefits the brain and Davis's
study extends the science to children and their ability to learn in school.
About
one-third of U.S. children are overweight. Davis suspects exercise would have a
similar impact on their leaner counterparts.
Physical Activity and Performance at School
A
systematic review of previous studies suggests that there may be a positive
relationship between physical activity and the academic performance of
children, according to a report in the January 2012 issue of Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent
Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
Amika
Singh, Ph.D., of the Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, EMGO
Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and
colleagues reviewed evidence about the relationship between physical activity
and academic performance because of concerns that pressure to improve test
scores may often mean more instructional time for classroom subjects with less time
for physical activity.
The
authors identified 10 observational and four interventional studies for review.
Twelve of the studies were conducted in the United States, plus one in Canada
and one in South Africa. Sample sizes ranged from 53 to about 12,000
participants between the ages of 6 years and 18 years. Follow-up varied from
eight weeks to more than five years.
"According
to the best-evidence synthesis, we found strong evidence of a significant
positive relationship between physical activity and academic performance. The
findings of one high-quality intervention study and one high-quality
observational study suggest that being more physically active is positively
related to improved academic performance in children," the authors
comment.
Background
information in the article suggests that exercise may help cognition by
increasing blood and oxygen flow to the brain, increasing levels of
norepinephrine and endorphins to decrease stress and improve mood, and
increasing growth factors that help create new nerve cells and support synaptic
plasticity.
No comments:
Post a Comment